Sure their nursing correspondent Debbie Evans pushes pharma drugs, (toxic poison) talking to so called doctor experts live on the programme.
Also, Katie Jo Murfin was doing little snippets for them from her bedroom, weird, but Richie Allen had interviewed an alleged NHS executive that seemingly knew about the hoax of the 2020 psyop. Bloody hell, it was 100% Murfins voice!
The footage they showed of the Ukraine war and the battles was laughable, not believable at all but their reporting was oh so serious.
Alex Thompson visiting Georgia just before the outbreak of the "Ukraine war" and reporting back to the studio from there with his local Georgian mate beside him. Was that his handler?
I waited so long for them to call out the virus hoax, but it was never going to be. They're as boring as hell and too many red flags now.
Perhaps I'm superfluously carrying more coal to Newcastle, but there is also no way getting around the fact that their so-called Gaza coverage is in near perfect pitch with big Mockingbird media's song sheet. At this juncture I suspect for a long time now that they no longer rely on "private donor support" to keep their smart lights on, if they ever really did to begin with.
If they are buttressed by untraceable govt./NGO tax extorted money they are aren't going anywhere and neither is the notion that their mantric "behavioral political psychology" pseudo-academic linguistics, and redundantly inane brand of yellow journalism.
That makes sense to me Gemma. I used to follow the UK Column in the early days, I was thirsty for knowledge back then. Mark Windows called Gerrish out a few weeks ago too when talking about the controlled op. Could you get Richard D Hall onto your show soon. I really like him
Not true. He was on Delingpod recently. Either way, that is no justification for their failure to cover his work. I have been covering it frequently as has Sarah Plumley and he has never appeared with us.
James Delingpole is a freemason. I saw him giving a masonic handshake on his channel and mentioned it in the comments. After that he banned all comments.
All I know is that the UK Column didn't appear on my radar during the Covid operation resistance period. It's a given that Psychological Operations units would start with a 'news' outlet to control narratives.
My point is that as someone who monitored the Covid attack, including the UK, to the point of obsession, I saw no fruit borne by the UK Column as far as resistance goes. I hadn't heard of the 77th Brigade. I find it interesting that it was formed at the same time as the populist rising and launch of the criminal tyrannical Sustainable Development Goals in 2015.
While I don't entirely accept all your criticisms of UK Column---who I do not write for btw---I think your broader points are well made. Especially with regard to the Richard D. Hall exposure of Manchester. Thanks for focusing on it in this discussion and others. - https://www.bitchute.com/video/09E6YvQhWP9c/
For what it is worth, I do not think UKC are controlled opposition. I know they hope to reach out to what they call "middle England Telegraph readers." This is why people like Mallet "fit" with there their objective to convince the middle class they are "serious."
They advise their audience to engage in politics because they believe that the system can be changed from within. Like you, I have never agreed with them on this point, but it does explain their coverage in my view.
I believe that objective informs the judgment they make on what they report. I also know how annoying it is to be criticised for what you don't report. We all have to pick our battles. But that approach has massive pitfalls in my opinion.
I suspect this is why they rarely touch false flag operations. They fear it would be a step too far for their target audience. Consequently, I think they sometimes fail to report on the really big issues that expose the State for what it is. Largely ignoring Richard D. Hall's excellent investigative journalism being a massive oversight on their part imho. I agree with you, this is a big problem when they draw so many viewers. It is no real help at all.
Thank you, Iain. Real journalism does not assess whether its audience would be able for the information. It also does NOT ‘pick its battles’. That is diplomacy which is exactly what these assets do. The truth is the truth and the media must report on the most uncomfortable and offensive truths. That is their most important role. I think you used to work for them so may be blinkered by that. It is not an accident that they refuse to cover the fake Manchester blast or the truth about 9/11. It is deliberate, and because of them, you are all in a worse-off position today regarding free speech and Richard D Hall has been thrown to the wolves. Intelligence assets should be kept a million miles away from the media.
I am shocked by the dishonesty displayed here. Personal grudges should stay out of professional writing. Brian Gerrish is as honest as they come. Honest people recognise other honest people.
Of course journalists "pick their battles." No one can investigate or report everything. The truth is everything, everywhere, all of the time. Why haven't you reported on everything you haven't reported on?
I have written extensively about false flags and the West's use of Islamist extremists as proxies in numerous conflicts, but I haven't written about the London Bridge attack, the Boston bombing or the Bataclan---which were all false flags in my view---and I've only written about Manchester in relation to Richard's reporting of it. What conclusion can you draw from that?
I think not reporting Richard's work, or at least not sharing it with their audience, was a massive oversight on UKC's part. But because I wrote for UKC freelance, I have spoken to them quite a bit, which is why I have offered my opinion. I disagree with them on many issues but they don't strike me as disingenuous at all.
You say they are intelligence assets. I disagree. Although if you have any evidence to substantiate that claim I would be interested to see it.
Nothing is more important at the moment in the UK but the case being taken against Richard and exposing the likes of Hibbert and Co because it cuts to the heart of the attack on free speech and press freedom. It would take them 10 minutes to upload his content onto their site and the videos of the various actors but they won’t and even if they did now, it’s way too late. You say this is an oversight. I say it is deliberate. Nobody who worked in military/intelligence which Gerrish did for so long should be anywhere near journalism. End of. Read the new Irish Light for more.
Charles Malet is very establishment, I believe he is in line to inherit a baronetcy, although I am not sure about this. JewK Column also hired eponymous Jew Ben Rubin.
I agree UK column are controlled. I have continually tried to point out to people about Alex Thompson being an obvious agent (he has all the credentials for military intelligence) including speaks many languages but people worship him because they have fallen for the 'christian' thing. I have had some odd dealings with Brian Gerrish where he asked me to write an article on a certain subject , and research certain subjects, but then was inconsistent in responding . Eventually he wanted to speak to me on the phone but when he realised I would only speak on a landline or old style mobile (ie not a video smartphone call) he didn't respond. I got the feeling he wanted to get a video recording of me and that is the only reason he wanted a phone call. Absolutely 100 percent agree on Charles Malet, so bloody obvious. But its not just them. I am glad when Richard D. Hall spoke to the shill James Delingpole, he made it clear he did not trust JD. Rightly so. JD apparently only woke up with covid. Yeh right. Malvern , Oxford, MSM fully fledged member of the establishment, mates with Boris , Carrie and Michael Gove and the little clique from Private Eye, and continually puts down his followers treating them like doormats and keeping only sycophants on his telegram channel whilst making it clear he is a 'shark' as he calls his followers 'sharklings'. He is there to push any deviants in the same direction the establishment have pushed the masses for the last two thousand years to prevent them actually fighting back, ie Greek Judaism (Christianity). And to promote religious division and exclusion. Anyone who does not do his groupthink is chucked off his channel. When he chucked me off his channel he then went on to tell everybody I was possessed and decided to diagnose me with a certain mental health condition. HOwever he has never met me and if he was truly awake he would know that (1) he is not a shrink and (2) even if he was, shrinks are full of establishment crap. Just a quick search through his old articles and you will find he is a zionist (contrary to the impression he is trying to give at the moment) and in true establishment fashion has viciously attacked those who oppose zionism. Funny how overnight he has gone from being a fully fledged MSM member of the elites to flat earther , Taylor Swift is a man, universe controlled by large insect being type of things - you know what I mean. Just doesn't kind of ring true really . He is laughing and mocking those who follow him . Here is one of his pro zionist articles https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/05/16/the-west-should-not-believe-hamas-dead-baby-propaganda/
Gerrish also contacted me to try to find out the source of a story because the lady who had published the story did not trust him and thought he was MI5.
Sure their nursing correspondent Debbie Evans pushes pharma drugs, (toxic poison) talking to so called doctor experts live on the programme.
Also, Katie Jo Murfin was doing little snippets for them from her bedroom, weird, but Richie Allen had interviewed an alleged NHS executive that seemingly knew about the hoax of the 2020 psyop. Bloody hell, it was 100% Murfins voice!
The footage they showed of the Ukraine war and the battles was laughable, not believable at all but their reporting was oh so serious.
Alex Thompson visiting Georgia just before the outbreak of the "Ukraine war" and reporting back to the studio from there with his local Georgian mate beside him. Was that his handler?
I waited so long for them to call out the virus hoax, but it was never going to be. They're as boring as hell and too many red flags now.
Fascinating. Do you have the link to that Bitchie Allen show?
It's some time ago but I'll do my best to find it.
Yes good links might be more important than ever.
Murfin's father, Eastenders actor Karl Howman, reads out scripts dictated to him by his MI5 handlers, on the Hugo Talks channel.
Perhaps I'm superfluously carrying more coal to Newcastle, but there is also no way getting around the fact that their so-called Gaza coverage is in near perfect pitch with big Mockingbird media's song sheet. At this juncture I suspect for a long time now that they no longer rely on "private donor support" to keep their smart lights on, if they ever really did to begin with.
If they are buttressed by untraceable govt./NGO tax extorted money they are aren't going anywhere and neither is the notion that their mantric "behavioral political psychology" pseudo-academic linguistics, and redundantly inane brand of yellow journalism.
I stopped listening to them.
Me too. Thank you for sharing.
That makes sense to me Gemma. I used to follow the UK Column in the early days, I was thirsty for knowledge back then. Mark Windows called Gerrish out a few weeks ago too when talking about the controlled op. Could you get Richard D Hall onto your show soon. I really like him
i believe richard does not go on anybody's else's show,only his own.
Not true. He was on Delingpod recently. Either way, that is no justification for their failure to cover his work. I have been covering it frequently as has Sarah Plumley and he has never appeared with us.
He did this excellent interview with Delingpole (that Gemma refers to below) and others as well. His work is forensic. Here's the link https://rumble.com/v45zc20-richard-d-hall.html
James Delingpole is a freemason. I saw him giving a masonic handshake on his channel and mentioned it in the comments. After that he banned all comments.
All I know is that the UK Column didn't appear on my radar during the Covid operation resistance period. It's a given that Psychological Operations units would start with a 'news' outlet to control narratives.
That's how I found them! And they kept me sane throughout all of the CoNvid bollocks.
It seems you have a lot of 77th Brigade trolls on here too?
My point is that as someone who monitored the Covid attack, including the UK, to the point of obsession, I saw no fruit borne by the UK Column as far as resistance goes. I hadn't heard of the 77th Brigade. I find it interesting that it was formed at the same time as the populist rising and launch of the criminal tyrannical Sustainable Development Goals in 2015.
God Bless you and your love of our country Gemma.
While I don't entirely accept all your criticisms of UK Column---who I do not write for btw---I think your broader points are well made. Especially with regard to the Richard D. Hall exposure of Manchester. Thanks for focusing on it in this discussion and others. - https://www.bitchute.com/video/09E6YvQhWP9c/
For what it is worth, I do not think UKC are controlled opposition. I know they hope to reach out to what they call "middle England Telegraph readers." This is why people like Mallet "fit" with there their objective to convince the middle class they are "serious."
They advise their audience to engage in politics because they believe that the system can be changed from within. Like you, I have never agreed with them on this point, but it does explain their coverage in my view.
I believe that objective informs the judgment they make on what they report. I also know how annoying it is to be criticised for what you don't report. We all have to pick our battles. But that approach has massive pitfalls in my opinion.
I suspect this is why they rarely touch false flag operations. They fear it would be a step too far for their target audience. Consequently, I think they sometimes fail to report on the really big issues that expose the State for what it is. Largely ignoring Richard D. Hall's excellent investigative journalism being a massive oversight on their part imho. I agree with you, this is a big problem when they draw so many viewers. It is no real help at all.
You may be interested in these articles.
https://iaindavis.com/disaster-troll-propaganda/
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/iain-davis-substack-rant-2-the-disaster
https://iaindavis.com/richard-d-hall-a-travesty-of-justice/
Thank you, Iain. Real journalism does not assess whether its audience would be able for the information. It also does NOT ‘pick its battles’. That is diplomacy which is exactly what these assets do. The truth is the truth and the media must report on the most uncomfortable and offensive truths. That is their most important role. I think you used to work for them so may be blinkered by that. It is not an accident that they refuse to cover the fake Manchester blast or the truth about 9/11. It is deliberate, and because of them, you are all in a worse-off position today regarding free speech and Richard D Hall has been thrown to the wolves. Intelligence assets should be kept a million miles away from the media.
UK Column recently on Richard D. Hall:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-9th-february-2024
He has also been covered other times.
Re 9/11, you presumably missed Daniele Ganser's First Annual David Ray Griffin Lecture, hosted by UKC:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/series/the-first-annual-david-ray-griffin-lecture-the-ruthless-empire-post-911
And all of this coverage of 9/11
https://www.ukcolumn.org/search?keywords=9%2F11
Most recently including an interview with Matt Campbell and Ted Walter, 'Demanding a new inquest into a 911 death:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/demanding-a-new-inquest-into-a-911-death-matt-campbell-and-ted-walter
I am shocked by the dishonesty displayed here. Personal grudges should stay out of professional writing. Brian Gerrish is as honest as they come. Honest people recognise other honest people.
Of course journalists "pick their battles." No one can investigate or report everything. The truth is everything, everywhere, all of the time. Why haven't you reported on everything you haven't reported on?
I have written extensively about false flags and the West's use of Islamist extremists as proxies in numerous conflicts, but I haven't written about the London Bridge attack, the Boston bombing or the Bataclan---which were all false flags in my view---and I've only written about Manchester in relation to Richard's reporting of it. What conclusion can you draw from that?
I think not reporting Richard's work, or at least not sharing it with their audience, was a massive oversight on UKC's part. But because I wrote for UKC freelance, I have spoken to them quite a bit, which is why I have offered my opinion. I disagree with them on many issues but they don't strike me as disingenuous at all.
You say they are intelligence assets. I disagree. Although if you have any evidence to substantiate that claim I would be interested to see it.
Nothing is more important at the moment in the UK but the case being taken against Richard and exposing the likes of Hibbert and Co because it cuts to the heart of the attack on free speech and press freedom. It would take them 10 minutes to upload his content onto their site and the videos of the various actors but they won’t and even if they did now, it’s way too late. You say this is an oversight. I say it is deliberate. Nobody who worked in military/intelligence which Gerrish did for so long should be anywhere near journalism. End of. Read the new Irish Light for more.
Fair enough. I agree Richard's case and the evidence he exposed is vital. We'll have to agree to disagree on UKC's motives for not showing it.
Journalism is both a vocation and a science. There is never a reason to "not show" evidence and facts.
There is if (like the MSM) you are following the official narrative or (like Govt) intent on keeping the truth away from the public.
Charles Malet is very establishment, I believe he is in line to inherit a baronetcy, although I am not sure about this. JewK Column also hired eponymous Jew Ben Rubin.
I agree UK column are controlled. I have continually tried to point out to people about Alex Thompson being an obvious agent (he has all the credentials for military intelligence) including speaks many languages but people worship him because they have fallen for the 'christian' thing. I have had some odd dealings with Brian Gerrish where he asked me to write an article on a certain subject , and research certain subjects, but then was inconsistent in responding . Eventually he wanted to speak to me on the phone but when he realised I would only speak on a landline or old style mobile (ie not a video smartphone call) he didn't respond. I got the feeling he wanted to get a video recording of me and that is the only reason he wanted a phone call. Absolutely 100 percent agree on Charles Malet, so bloody obvious. But its not just them. I am glad when Richard D. Hall spoke to the shill James Delingpole, he made it clear he did not trust JD. Rightly so. JD apparently only woke up with covid. Yeh right. Malvern , Oxford, MSM fully fledged member of the establishment, mates with Boris , Carrie and Michael Gove and the little clique from Private Eye, and continually puts down his followers treating them like doormats and keeping only sycophants on his telegram channel whilst making it clear he is a 'shark' as he calls his followers 'sharklings'. He is there to push any deviants in the same direction the establishment have pushed the masses for the last two thousand years to prevent them actually fighting back, ie Greek Judaism (Christianity). And to promote religious division and exclusion. Anyone who does not do his groupthink is chucked off his channel. When he chucked me off his channel he then went on to tell everybody I was possessed and decided to diagnose me with a certain mental health condition. HOwever he has never met me and if he was truly awake he would know that (1) he is not a shrink and (2) even if he was, shrinks are full of establishment crap. Just a quick search through his old articles and you will find he is a zionist (contrary to the impression he is trying to give at the moment) and in true establishment fashion has viciously attacked those who oppose zionism. Funny how overnight he has gone from being a fully fledged MSM member of the elites to flat earther , Taylor Swift is a man, universe controlled by large insect being type of things - you know what I mean. Just doesn't kind of ring true really . He is laughing and mocking those who follow him . Here is one of his pro zionist articles https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/05/16/the-west-should-not-believe-hamas-dead-baby-propaganda/
Gerrish also contacted me to try to find out the source of a story because the lady who had published the story did not trust him and thought he was MI5.
A news story from 2017 stuck with me regarding the Manchester event. There was a guy who claimed that he took it upon himself to move the body of the alleged bomber out of sight. I looked it up and it turns out he served 22 years as a staff sergeant in the Royal Military Police. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hero-dad-hid-manchester-bombers-10517374 The photo of the alleged bomber 'moments before' the event conceals everything around him with black censorship editing, WHY? https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article10512764.ece/ALTERNATES/n310p/THP_MDG_270517Greater_270JPG.jpg
If anyone has any doubts about the use of children for false flag violent events , here's some classic examples. This little guy was daubed with stage make-up and placed in an ambulance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3VPBtorifU These children were abused for a staged chemical attack https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNIp1lZwJts One of the abused kids spoke about it later https://youtu.be/Kpv0K90t4lI I feel bad for these two boys being used but their performance is obnoxious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SklfRU8_J8k