72 Comments
User's avatar
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

Trolls who put disinformation in the comments will be banned

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

9/11 in NYC involved real planes. The second one flew right over my head as i had just exited my office in world financial Bldg #1. I refuse to let you rewrite history to suit your purposes. I did not see the first plane, but i absolutely saw the second one. Unfortunately.

Expand full comment
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

Of course you did lol

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

Wow, that is an appalling post. No real experience will ever convince you that what you have made up isn’t true.

Expand full comment
Fakenukes Phil's avatar

A real experience on 9/11 would include seeing human bodies squirt out the sides of flight 175 because that is the path of least resistance, but you expect us to believe the entire aircraft melted into the concrete and steel building which defies every single law of science and physics

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

Newton's Third Law of Motion, recast as conservation of momentum: m1v1 = m2v2. m is mass, v is velocity.

Are you arguing that a fully loaded and fueled airliner travelling at hundreds of miles per hour wouldn't have the momentum to displace any concrete, steel or glass?

Expand full comment
Eoin Clancy's avatar

Newton was a fake, as is gravity.

Expand full comment
Fakenukes Phil's avatar

it’s impossible for flight 175 to have been traveling “hundreds of miles per hour” as you claim, the air is too dense at sea level and the wings would vibrate too much to allow control, we obviously watched a CARTOON from 9/11 which explains why we saw all the impossible things from that impact

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

A Boeing 767 retracts its landing gear at 250-300 mph.

Expand full comment
Nicholas John Ennos's avatar

A jelly flying at a million miles an hour wouldn't displace concrete and steel.

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

I don't deny planes but I do deny passenger airliner crashes.

https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/four-faked-plane-crashes.html

Expand full comment
Fakenukes Phil's avatar

No planes on 9/11

Expand full comment
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

Great to see you here, FNP. Please assist the desperate trolls - they actually believe that planes can slice through concrete/steel buildings like a hot knife through butter...

Expand full comment
Fakenukes Phil's avatar

Yes I’m learning the format here, working on my avatar

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

I know someone who was in the vicinity of the WTC and saw a plane heading to the South tower although he didn't see it penetrate.

The fact that aeronautical devices may have flown around the WTC isn't the main point. The main point is that the nominated passenger airliners didn't fly there or anywhere.

The nominated passenger airliner crashes were faked.

That's the important point.

And just as nobody died in a plane nor did anyone die in a building (or at least there's no clear evidence of it).

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

This is woke nonsense. You can rewrite this bs all you want. You dont get to trivialize 1st person eyewitness testimony. We all know what planes look like. You have no right to say otherwise. I put you in the same camp as those idiots who say men can get pregnant. Saying it doesnt make it so. I call total BS on you and your ilk.

Expand full comment
Nicholas John Ennos's avatar

There is a ton of first person eyewitness testimony of the holocaust and that was fake. Eyewitness testimony is the least reliable evidence.

Expand full comment
Brendan's avatar

You need to research "woke" buddy. I think you're a little confused.

Expand full comment
Trish Chedgzoy's avatar

What you saw was a psyop it was CGI 😳

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

Bodies falling too???? You are totally full of BS. You are part of the problem.

Expand full comment
Steveo's avatar

Project bluebeam. They can make you think you saw anything.

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

No they cant. Even God doesnt do that.

Expand full comment
Steveo's avatar

Sure they can, and have. Even newscasters reported no plane debris, yet passports of the terrorists survived lol

Expand full comment
Trish Chedgzoy's avatar

We are not saying people were not killed, they were, sacrificed for the globalists, it was a controlled demolition detonated with explosives, you are the stupid dumb one!!! Do your research. Another troll added to the mix

Expand full comment
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

We are. We have called out the crisis actor families lots of times. The buildings had been emptied out for demolition - controlled explosions. They were unfit for purpose. A few fireman maybe went down but that’s about it

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

I was there!! I dont need to do research!! Why should i read stuff from other ifiots who werent there??? Were you there?? Were you even alive???

Expand full comment
Fakenukes Phil's avatar

I live in Palm Springs and I know for a fact the local police had the street closed off before our recent terror bombing. People who live in Palm Springs are completely oblivious to what happened that day, so just saying “I was there” means absolutely nothing. You are either deceived, like everyone in Palm Springs, or you are a disinformation agent

Expand full comment
Trish Chedgzoy's avatar

It was a big pile of nonsense and you know it.

Expand full comment
Robert Evenden's avatar

This is a worthless discussion.

Expand full comment
The Cazuzo's avatar

Brasilians too sell their mother… except that there is no delivery…

Expand full comment
Jean Murray's avatar

Brilliant article.

Well detailed.

Flawless.

Expand full comment
Terra Times's avatar

Excellent!!! Thanks Gemma!

Expand full comment
Gerry_O'C's avatar

...BJ Medical College founded 1871...there's a 171, and 8 families awaiting dna based confirmation...8 is associated with completion... the Boeing is 57 metres in length, the tail end is pictured wedged in a way that is so close to the ground, the height of which building is low anyway, the proportions are suspicious...the 'attitude' of the plane didn't suggest as if it was goin down, the angle it hit, i'd have to watch again, it broke in half, they reported, precisely when, and the back half went on fire...

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Nice takedown of the Air India hoax, but do't fall for the cgi propaganda for 9/11

Here's an neasy debunk of the cgi propaganda mentioned in this post about the plane being cgi:

https://t.me/meslinks/24545

There doesn't seem to be cgi used on the 9/11 event.

Also, there doesn't seem to have been any planes that day (there's a lot of evidence the real planes were somewhere else: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-was-american-flight-11-flying-657?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2336712&post_id=165785829&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=xafil&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email)

How do I square that hole that there were no planes but the it is also no cgi? Here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
steve's avatar

In order to control the outcome it would be more efficient to only have 1 crisis actor to manage; i.e. the "survivor". This could be done by remote hi-jacking the aircraft and putting the flight control computers into landing mode directly after takeoff and crashing the plane to achieve no survivors. This way the aftermath would not involve the ongoing difficulties arising from the process of perpetuating the lies.

Expand full comment
Trish Chedgzoy's avatar

Another great piece Gemma, I always laugh out load with your writing it’s so good.Your right they are replacing us with the Indians, every petrol station, co-op and post office near me is run entirely by Indians.

Expand full comment
Daithi's avatar

Commenting quick to make it 34 as I saw there were 33. Very risky!

Expand full comment
Gerry_O'C's avatar

... Flight AI 171...AI, AI, AI... 🤔... 😀... had been used?...

Expand full comment
Deltayankeezulu卐's avatar

AI is the IATA code of the airline. Nothing to do with artificial intelligence whatsoever.

Expand full comment
Gerry_O'C's avatar

...the use of the second emoji suggests the comment is tongue in cheek, however, if i was serious about this, i'd look into it...i had no interest in the crash, when i initially heard someone walked away in the circumstances. that is hugely suspicious, as for crisis actors, some appear very obvious, it's tragic of course if people died... i do know of the IATA code, a friend returned from Southern India, Tamil Nadu during the week...

Expand full comment
Deltayankeezulu卐's avatar

Oh, I know. 😉 I totally get why one might have the suspicion it's a hoax.

Expand full comment
Gerry_O'C's avatar

...tbh i don't have any inclination to pursue the ideas about the crash, i actually commented from the perspective that i wasn't takin myself seriously about it...it was late, i was winding down and got drawn in to the content, i was a bit curious, that's all...there are far more imminent dangers approaching us here that ought to absorb our attention...

Expand full comment
Deltayankeezulu卐's avatar

Yep totally get it

Expand full comment
Gerry_O'C's avatar

... https://india.kidzania.com/en-in/pages/role-play ... even this, from the content in the poster resonates...'cause of the embedded wreckage.. "It is an embedded behaviour in all children and is an essential ingredient in the KidZania experience."...

Expand full comment
John Brophy's avatar

I went to FlighRadar24 site for the tracking: https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/live/air-india-boeing-787-8-crashes-on-takeoff-in-ahmedabad/. Could be terrorism then. Would Pakistan be behind a dirty war now? Not a bird strike as that theory does not seem to have gained traction. Investigation could take years and could be fudged by Boeing, NTSB, Indian authorities. Just some thoughts.

Expand full comment
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

FlightRadar is well and truly controlled just like the actors in the fake crash

Expand full comment
John Brophy's avatar

I would not rule out their capture by rogue elements for staged events. Maybe we will have some more indicators in the months ahead...

Expand full comment
Gemma O’Doherty's avatar

There are no 'rogue elements' - there is only the Jewish hoax machine.

Expand full comment
unworried's avatar

B737MAX crashes were all about regulatory capture. Unlike big pharma (c19 at least 17 million injection effects) it was removed from service for 2 years, was fixed and senior heads did roll.

Expand full comment
John Brophy's avatar

Yes, Boeing has had serious issues and they are not resolved. Trump just cancelled the new air force 1 and looked to Qatar instead. Back to the hoax theory - I don't recall any such discussions around MH17 over Ukraine, or MH 370 over Indian ocean. Seems these were real tragedies not fake, though causes were disputed.

Expand full comment
Nicholas John Ennos's avatar

Investigations showed that MH370 was diverted to the US

Air Base in Diego Garcia where all the passengers were killed. This was because some of the passengers held important semiconductor patents which on their deaths reverted to the Rothschilds. The MH370 was then repainted to be the MH17. It was filled with the frozen bodies of the MH370 passengers and then flown over Ukraine and shot down by the Ukrainians to blame it on Russia. Rescuers on the scene noted the decomposed state of the bodies. The shape of the windows and their layout proved the plane shot down over Ukraine was MH370.

Expand full comment
John Brophy's avatar

I had not heard of that. That is wild!

Expand full comment
Kirsten Kennedy's avatar

Great and funny and entertaining article. I watched this stuff (9/11 crash) for years and was completely under the spell. Normies WILL say it’s entirely normal for someone to be filming planes at all times. But the other stuff is harder for them to refute.

Expand full comment
Nicholas John Ennos's avatar

Thinking about it, they must have used footage of a plane landing which is why the undercarriage is down. This makes it very hard for them to explain why a plane taking off still had the undercarriage down. It will be interesting to see how they explain this away.

Expand full comment
Anomalous Farrier's avatar

This entire incident is part and parcel of a large buildup to the eventual grounding of all commercial aircraft. They need to ground them to avoid them all falling out of the sky when the Phoenix moment approaches.

But, first things first. Trump will be "assassinated" (hoaxed) except this time they'll convince the world he's dead. He won't be however.

People might consider reading Martin Vrijland's website.

Expand full comment