Orwellian Ireland: Ask No Questions About The Pandemic Of Sudden Death
The latest psychological operation designed to silence the speech of the Irish people has raised some significant questions about the life and death of a Cavan teenager
A fortnight ago, the mainstream media embarked on a frenzied attack against ‘The Irish Light’ and Gemma O’Doherty. This latest charade, which appears to be collapsing all around them, was launched to bring in new hate laws to gag the Irish people from asking questions about suspicious, sudden deaths for fear of ‘offending’ someone.
We knew we were directly above target with the latest edition of The Irish Light which names and shames the gang who framed Aaron Brady without a shred of evidence, including state prosecutor Brendan Grehan SC and senior gardai Mark Phillips and Pat Marry.
The powers-that-shouldn’t-be are fuming over that exposé and launched their latest strike a few days after it was published.
I’ve been warning my subscribers for a while that the Drew ‘Harass’ regime had been planning some sort of ‘hate hoax’ to justify forthcoming legislation to restrict free speech but the tissue of lies they’ve concocted on this occasion represents a new low even for them, because they’re exploiting the death of a young man for their own sick gain.
The background to this latest episode is as follows. In November, we published the ‘Died Suddenly’ edition of The Irish Light in which we selected the faces of 40 young people (unnamed) from the hundreds of youngsters who have ‘died suddenly’ since the launch of the vaccine in 2021.
Their pictures covered no more than a space of approximately one inch squared and had already been published on RIP.ie and in the media, and were widely available online.
The article stated clearly that we did NOT know how they died and that all we did know was that their deaths were sudden and unexpected, according to the death notices, condolences and newspaper articles about them.
Obviously, the article related to a matter of substantial public interest, especially since the controlled media are completely ignoring this tsunami of young deaths.
We simply asked why are all these young people dying - since that is our job as journalists - but in Police State Ireland, such questions are now verboten.
Some days after the publication of the paper, a volatile woman from Kingscourt in Cavan went on RTE Drivetime claiming to be devastated and traumatised over the use of a tiny picture of her son on the front page with several dozen others.
In a bizarre coincidence, someone she knew had seen it in a shop in Monaghan and given it to her.
Edel Gilsenan said she was adamant that her son Diego (18), who died suddenly on August 25th 2021, had killed himself and that it was to nothing to do with the vaccine.
Even though our article made it clear that suicide could have been the cause of some of the deaths, the rabid media ignored that critical point and launched their feeding frenzy, exploiting and manipulating a clearly unstable woman.
Why let the truth get in the way of a story that can be manipulated to advance their dystopian cause?
Out of respect for Ms Gilsenan’s apparent upset - although I did not know her true motivations at the time - I chose not to put the front page of the paper on our website for several months even though she had told the most outrageous lies about me and The Irish Light.
It should be stated from the outset that there is nothing illegal, unethical or journalistically unusual for a newspaper to use a picture of a deceased person that has already been posted publicly online, no matter what age the person is, although in this case, the individual was an adult. In fact, that is how the media obtain most pictures nowadays. They are even more justified in doing so when the person has died in what appears to be unexpected and possibly suspicious circumstances because it is the function of the media to inform the public about such deaths and inquire as to how they happened. Yet suddenly, the press pack were screeching like hyenas because The Irish Light had engaged in this normal journalistic practice. The stench of a very large rodent was already all over this pantomime.
Given the scale of sudden deaths in 2023, I decided to repost the front page in February. Due to the online suppression of The Irish Light by the regime, anyone feeling tormented or mentally volatile at the sight of the images, like Ms Gilsenan claimed to be, could simply avoid such trauma by not logging onto our website, which is probably the most censored in Ireland. Oddly, she has absolutely no issue with Diego’s picture appearing on other mainstream media. and thanks to her, his name will soon be a household name so privacy was never an issue for her. Just one of the many anomalies in the case.
We have since blocked out all of the faces to highlight the media’s dire attempts to shut down knowledge of the sudden death epidemic.
We have done absolutely nothing wrong - morally, legally or otherwise. Indeed the publishing of those young Irish faces who had ‘died suddenly’ was one of the most important pieces of journalism perhaps in Irish history. The public have a right to know the scale of this very real pandemic of unprecedented unexpected death, which is NOT a private family matter.
A fortnight ago, the media relaunched the next phase of the drama. In what was clearly a co-ordinated offensive, a tsunami of emails landed in the newspaper’s inbox within hours of each other, claiming that Edel Campbell was suing Gemma O’Doherty and The Irish Light for a ‘campaign of harassment’ no less.
A ‘campaign of harassment’ against a person I have never had any contact with in my life except to block her from accessing my phone because she somehow got hold of my mobile number. I wonder who could have given her that!!
Every day, for at least a week, the attack stories ran in RTE, The Irish Times, Independent and a raft of local papers with journaliars in full scavenger mode once again seeking Gemma’s head on a plate because she was telling the stories they refused to. They salivated over the idea that a legal action had been ‘launched’ against the only paper in Ireland exposing the vaccine genocide and the truth about the vile dictatorship in which we now live.
In recent years, among the copious failed attempts to silence me, I’ve seen off many vexatious and simply farcical ‘lawfare’ attacks on my work (a tactic of warfare against real journalists). But this latest one is up there with the most ridiculous yet, so out of curiosity, I decided to probe the background to the case, and before long, it became clear that all was not as it seemed.
The outfit running the ‘legal action’ is a hard-left operation run by a solicitor called Ciarán Mulholland from ‘West Belfast’ (cough). A former Shinner, he’s not backward in displaying his Marxist leanings with his website revealing a statue of mass murderer Lenin on his desk. His Dublin office happens to be housed in the same building as The Communist Party Of Ireland in Temple Bar. Just a coincidence of course!
In classic Antifa-style, he has been given free rein on the national airwaves to spew vitriol and fabrications about me in a manner verging on obsessive compulsive disorder. It has been a trial by media - always a sign that a legal action is unactionable!
But the big reveal in all of this, which has been carefully cultivated and nurtured by RTÉ and the regime media, is their declaration that the purpose of the whole endeavour is to bring about a change in the law:
As the Drivetime tweet states below, the objective of Edel Campbell is ‘legislative change.’
So a vulnerable mother - who has obviously undergone severe trauma and is being heavily manipulated - wants to change the law because her feelings were hurt?
What this means in real terms is that a plan is being concocted to make it illegal for any nosy parkers such as actual journalists raising any questions about suspicious deaths in Ireland for fear of offending a relative or anyone. Sounds more like an attempt to cover up a vaccine genocide to me!
Of course the obligatory fundraiser has been launched by a notorious Cavan statist and political ‘lobbyist’ called Kristofer Shekleton (emphasis on the shekel) piling more vulgarity on to the grubby enterprise.
Last week, I requested the 2022 inquest report from Cavan coroner Dr Mary Flanagan, who is based in Castleblaney, Co. Monaghan. I was initially told only next of kin could give permission for it to be released. This is patently untrue. The law is very clear that inquest reports must be made available to the public because they are public inquiries to establish the cause of an unexpected or suspicious death.
I reminded the coroner’s office that they work for the Irish people who pay their salaries. The next morning, a four-page PDF landed in my email with just three witness statements which were glaringly sparse, inconsistent and evidently incomplete.
They are attached below so you can see them for yourselves.
The story as it was presented by Edel Campbell is as follows:
Diego Campbell died in the early hours of August 25th 2021. His mother says she found him hanging from a ‘wooden thing’ in the garden shed.
At 7.30am on the morning of the 24th, Ms Campbell says she brought Diego to work at Kingspan in Carrickmacross, Co Monaghan. She also brought his friend Owen McArdle - a run she shared with his mother Regina - a senior Garda from Kingscourt.
Ms Campbell says Regina McArdle would usually pick them up but does not clarify whether she did so on this occasion.
She said Diego came home at 5pm and that they sat in the kitchen and filled out his medical card form. There is no explanation provided as to why Diego needed a medical card. At about 6.15pm, Regina and Owen picked Diego up, she said, to bring them to a local pub. Campbell says she received messages and videos of Diego and Owen in the pub.
She says Diego rang her on the way home and that he walked home. He got home at 10.20pm, she says. She does not say if she saw him when he got home but says she received a message from him that he wanted to talk to her the following day. She said a lot of messages came in from him and that she asked him to talk to her but that he messaged to say ‘tomorrow’ would be fine.
She says she ‘had been in bed when Diego got home.’ She then goes on to say that on the following morning, Wednesday, August 25th, 2021, she got up at 7pm and checked her phone.
She says there were two missed messages from Diego which were sent at 12.58 am. The first message was ‘I love you Mam’ and the second was ‘Don’t think I don’t.’
She says she went into the bedroom and Diego’s bed was made. This could imply that it had not been slept in. Did Diego go to bed at all that night?
She says she ‘came downstairs and Diego’s headphones and Playstation were on the kitchen counter; the key was in the patio door and the snib was down.’ She says they always took the key out of the patio door at night. She then states she rang Diego’s phone because she was ‘too scared’ to go outside. She says she ‘took Diego’s headphones and Playstation back upstairs to check upstairs.’
She then states she ‘went out to the garden shed and got Diego.’ She says ‘Diego was hanging from a wooden thing across the roof of the shed.’ She does not explain what this ‘wooden thing’ is. She then says ‘Diego was there for ages’, even though no evidence is provided as to how she knew this. She says that she went into the house and got Colin (presumably her current husband), that Colin went into the shed and she rang Diego’s Dad Peter. (Peter is not in fact Diego’s father. His identity is unknown.)
She then says:
“Peter and Sinead came over and Colin and Peter took Diego from the shed and placed him on the patio area outside the shed. It was about 7.10am on August 25th 2021 when I found Diego in the garden shed.”
There is no mention of calling the Gardaí or emergency services, and even though Edel said she knew Diego had been there for ‘a long time’ implying that he was dead, she proceeded to have him taken from the shed and moved to the patio before the Gardaí arrived: this could be interpreted as interfering with a potential crime scene.
In the only Garda statement provided - another exercise in brevity - Garda Tony O’Reilly stationed at Bailieboro, Cavan, said he attended at the scene at 7.30am with his colleague Sgt O’Donnell.
He said Diego was ‘lying on the ground outside the door of a timber garden shed’ and that his mother told him that she had found Diego hanging in the shed at 7.10am. No detail other than that.
It’s extraordinary how, in just a 20-minute time frame, Edel had the wherewithal to contact her ex-husband Peter Carroll, wait for him to arrive, remove Diego from the shed and place him on the patio before the Gardai came at 7.30am.
How did Edel know Diego had committed suicide? In her interviews, she has described him as the ‘happiest boy’ and in ‘the most amazing form’ and that he had even bought a year’s subscription for Playstation earlier that day. It doesn’t sound like somebody who is planning to kill themselves.
Indeed many’s a murder has been made to look like a suicide, although we cannot say this is the situation here. But take the case of Siobhán Kearney, the 38-year-old Dublin mother-of-one who died in 2006 in her Goatstown home as a result of asphyxiation due to neck compression. Her husband Brian claimed she had killed herself but it subsequently emerged he had strangled her with a hoover flex which he had pulled over the door of their en-suite bathroom to make it look like a suicide. He was jailed for life in 2008.
We will now consider the statement of Diego’s friend Owen McArdle which is equally perplexing and even shorter than Edel Campbell’s one which it conflicts with.
McArdle states that he was working with Diego on Tuesday, August 24th until 4.30pm. They decided to go for ‘a few pints in M&F’s pub in Kingscourt.’
‘We stayed in M&F’s for the evening and I had about 6 pints of Guinness and I’m nearly sure Diego had the same. About 11.30pm, the barman said he was finishing up. Diego got the remainder of his pint into a carryout glass and left to go home. I left about 5 minutes after Diego. I went home. The chat in the pub was the normal stuff. When I got home Diego sent me a snapchat and I could see that he was crying. We texted over and back 4-5 times. The last text I sent him was about 1.47am and Diego didn’t reply back to me. The last time I seen Diego was when he left the pub and he left on his own.’
The first blatant discrepancy in this is the time difference in his statement compared to Edel Campbell who claimed Diego was home by 10.20pm while Owen McArdle states they did not leave the pub until after 11.30pm. Therefore he is unlikely to have got home before midnight.
Another alarming aspect of McArdle’s statement is that it is unsigned and was taken ‘in absentia’: in other words, he does not appear to have attended the inquest. Why not, given he is a key witness and possibly the last person to see Diego?
The post mortem too is severely deficient. It confirms the teenager died as a result of an obstructed airway with ligature around the neck. But no reference is made to any examination of the torso, arms and hands which might show defensive or assault injuries. There is also no reference to the type of knot used or the length of rope.
Also unusual is the fact that hanging has been deleted as the cause of death and asphyxia due to ligature has been inserted instead. This change is neither signed or initialed and there is no explanation as to why, when and by whom it was changed despite several requests to the coroner.
Another bizarre twist is the fact that the pathology report was not completed for almost three months after the death. Why?
The Garda evidence is also extremely scant and there are no depositions from other witnesses who attended the scene before the Gardaí including Peter Carroll and ‘Sinead’. The inquest report contains no photographs or description of the shed or the ‘wooden thing’ Diego was apparently hanging from.
There is no information as to how the body was taken down or the rope cut. There is no phone analysis given. And no Garda investigation was carried out to rule out foul play.
It is unquestionable that the details presented fall far short of a satisfactory inquiry especially since this case is being used to take away the free speech of the Irish people and every detail of it must be scrutinised.
Obviously it is my intention to call all of these witnesses and many others to the hearing to make sure all the many inconsistencies and omissions are ironed out and the full facts are established.
Here are just 20 of the many questions that need to be answered and which underline the reason why it is so important that journalists are free to do their jobs and investigate suspicious deaths in Ireland without the fear of being prosecuted, especially given the rampant levels of corruption within the Gardaí.
No matter what the outcome of this nonsensical action, nothing will stop me in my work as a professional journalist exposing deaths which have been covered up by the state. Hate laws are there to be broken and I will be the first to do so, with pleasure.
Edel Campbell says Diego got home at 10.20pm but Owen McArdle says they did not leave the pub until after 11.30pm. This is a major discrepancy. Why has this not been reconciled by the coroner?
Why did senior garda Regina McArdle not give a deposition, despite having been with the deceased at least twice the day before his death? What is her account of the 24th and 25th of August 2021?
Why did Edel Campbell not talk to her son in person when he texted her the evening before his death to say he needed to talk to her?
What was the content of the phone call between Edel and Diego as he walked home from the pub? At what time did this phone call take place, according to phone records?
What was the content of the texts shared between them when he got home? Why is this not mentioned in the inquest?
Why did Edel and Colin wait until Peter Carroll had arrived before removing Diego from where Edel says he was hanging? If they had any suspicion Diego was still alive, they should have removed him immediately. There would be no reason to delay. Was CPR attempted? Conversely, if they were certain that Diego was deceased they should not have interfered with the scene.
How is it possible for Edel to have found Diego, contacted Peter Carroll, waited for him to arrive at the house and removed Diego’s body from the shed in just a 20-minute window before the Gardaí arrived?
Why did Edel Campbell say she was too ‘scared’ to go into the garden to find Diego? What was she frightened of? She claimed on RTE that he ‘absolutely loved life’ and was ‘in such amazing form’ before his alleged suicide and had just bought a year subscription to Playstation.
What is the ‘wooden thing’ that Diego was hanging from in the garden shed? Why was this not clarified by the inquest?
Why is Owen McArdle’s statement not signed?
Why did Owen McArdle not attend the inquest given that he appears to have been the last person in Diego’s company and claims he was crying before he died? His evidence also conflicts with Edel’s.
What was the content of the messages exchanged between Owen and Diego the night before/of Diego’s death?
Why does his deposition fail to give any detail of where he went after leaving the pub or name anybody who could vouch for his presence?
Why was the post mortem changed from hanging to asphyxia caused by ligature?
Why has there been no Garda investigation?
What did Gardaí observe of the shed when they arrived on the scene of the sudden death? Was there a suicide note? If so, what did it contain? Garda Tony O’Reilly only notes the presence of Edel at the scene. Why does he make no reference to the others who were present?
Why did it take three months to sign the post mortem report?
Were any of the Gilsenans known to Gardaí prior to 25th August 2021, particularly in relation to drug dealing? Is there any reason to suspect that Diego may have been murdered because he had upset somebody or was involved in drugs himself?
Edel Gilsenan said in one of her interviews: ‘yeah, he had some fun through the years growing up, don’t they all?’ What sort of fun was she referring to?
Why is there such a concerted effort by the media to stop any questioning of this young man’s death?
Please let me know your thoughts on this case and share this article widely.
Trolls will be deleted
Facts are not defamation or harassment.The omission of facts about spike protein injection risks is deadly criminal disinformation.The poison propagandists that pose as journalists will be prosecuted for their role in denying millions of people informed consent for a medical procedure that was disabling or fatal.They think the fictitious 'Long Covid' media blitz will conceal their murders. It's fitting that the trashy Irish judiciary cite the Soviet-style Infowars Show Trial. Legal scholars that hate Alex Jones were stunned and disgusted by the unprecedented criminal behavior by the judge.He was found guilty by the judge with no defense evidence allowed, then the jury were instructed to steal Infowars money based on an inflated fraudulent financial assessment.The persecution of journalists has escalated beyond 'lawfare' to State-Level Cyber Warfare propaganda attacks deployed against dissidents.The Twitter Trend Bot spamming and the hundreds of anonymous and generic 'Irish' named gofundme donations to Edel Campbell are evidence of MI5 grade operations.The 20,000 euros target was generated by 800 mostly anonymous donations in 8 days. Shekleton is a health lobbyist so there's a clue that this latest attack on Gemma is mainly about the concealment of medical crimes.Diego's threadbare shambolic inquest poses more questions than answers. It's an insult to decency and shows how little respect they have for the deceased and the rule of law. Pfizer's Covid injection trial documents show that psychiatric disturbances were one of the top adverse reactions, so assuming Diego was injected and did commit suicide, the Covid injection can't be ruled out as a possible cause of death.Since early 2020 the Irish Slimes published a montage photo of elderly people who had died or were murdered during the initial fraud Covid PCR Death Cert harvest.They published that photo every day for years.Those people had pneumonia and/or multiple comorbidities.There is no evidence for a virus nor is there a test for said phantom virus so why are the media using their photos without consent.Varadkar admitted that Covid Death Certs are junk science yet the media keep publishing fraud death numbers.Would the friends and families approve of their loved ones deaths being used as terroristic marketing for a murderous corporate fraud that killed and injured hundreds of thousands of Irish people?.Here's their injection promotional piece.
https://www.irishtimes.com/obituaries/covid-19-lives-lost/
The Independent got in on the Pharma terrorism marketing too with a similar montage of fraud 'Covid victims' used without consent.
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/covid-stories-remembering-lives-lost-in-32-counties/41461067.html
The Leninists at Mulholland Law are determined to add The Irish to the stack of 100 million starved and executed dead bodies, sacrificed on the alter of Communism in the 20th century.We will not allow them.This tacky character assassination attempt on Gemma is a proxy to smear all those who share her views.Our free speech won't be chilled, we will burn brighter than ever.