Auschwitz Is The Refutation Of Christ
Dr E. Michael Jones on the Judaizers who call themselves Catholic whose feathers are ruffled because he is speaking at an upcoming conference on The Faith
I remember when Mark Shea wanted to become the next G. K. Chesterton. At that point in his career, Shea hadn’t gotten the memo from Dawn Goldstein explaining that Chesterton was an anti-Semite, and so he continued to adopt the persona of the jovial witty pundit at outlets like the National Catholic Register. Unlike Chesterton, however, Shea could never disguise the anger and hatred in his writings when he came across someone he didn’t like. Robert Sungenis was a good example. I don’t know why Shea took a dislike to Sungenis, but once that happened Shea felt that he was no longer bound by either common decency or the moral law in dealing with him. That came out when Shea reported that Sungenis was so drunk at the Geocentrism conference he sponsored in South Bend, that he had to be helped from the stage.
This was a vicious lie, but Shea refused to apologize for promoting this slander and refused to issue a retraction. He then said that I gave a talk at the same conference on “the cranial capacity of the Negro,”which was another slanderous lie. Anyone familiar with my work knows that I do not play the race card.
When I confronted Shea, he refused to retract his lie and refused to run my response to his slanders because doing so would be giving a platform to someone he deemed an “anti-Semite.” As soon as that word appears, Christian charity, respect for the good name of another, and common decency disappear.
If Shea takes a dislike to you, you lose whatever right you had to your good name or to protest against his lies. Shea continues to lie about me. He continues to put words in my mouth as his way of assassinating my character, but his main focus now is guilt by association.
As he lost his audience, Shea compensated by becoming more mean-spirited, causing him to lose evenmore of this audience. Eventually, Shea’s mendacity and his hatred caught up with him, and he lost his audience, and everyone pretty much forgot about him until he resurrected himself, not as Chesterton redivivus but as Ilya Ehrenberg. For those of you who don’t know, Ehrenberg was the the Jewish propagandist who encouraged the Soviet armies to commit atrocities against the German people. Shea at this point reinvented himself as commissar whose main job was now imposing Jewish taboos on the Catholic faithful.
Seeing a moment of opportunity, he attacked Patrick Coffin by trying to get people to dissociate themselves from his Hope is Fuel conference. The message was clear. Jones is unclean. Anyone who associates with Jones will become unclean by association, and Mark Shea will then go out of his way to denounce you as a bad person and ruin your ability to earn a livelihood by adopting the tactics of the Anti-Defamation League.
Unlike Jonathan Greenblatt, Shea will do this in the name of Catholicism, even though this behaviour is the antithesis of Catholic behaviour as Jesus pointed out when he rebuked the Pharisees when they criticized him for dining with tax collectors and prostitutes. The terms which allow this outrageously un-Christian behavior are “anti-Semitism” and “holocaust.” By deploying those terms, Shea acquires Jewish privilege, which still has currency in some Catholic circles, and this allows him to become the commissar who will denounce you if you don’t accept his imposition of Jewish values on the Catholic faithful. Janet Smith had to learn this lesson the hard way.
When Jennifer Roback Morse played the anti-Semitism card against Coffin, Smith felt that she had the freedom of the Gospel on her side and said she was not dropping out of the Hope is Fuel conference. Then Mark Shea laid into her, and she folded like a cheap suit. And then Mark Shea denounced her because she didn’t fold fast enough. This is the fate of people who cross Mark Shea.
There is a lesson to be learned here. If you abandon the freedom of the gospel and return to the vomit of Jewish taboo, Mark Shea and Dawn Goldstein will rule you with an iron rod. Like their Jewish masters, they will not forgive, and they will not forget, as Janet Smith found out. If you are planning to hold a conference, you will have to submit the names of all participants to Commissars Shea and Goldstein in advance, and they will tell you who you are allowed to invite and who you are not allowed to invite.
If they succeed in carrying out the attack they launched on Patrick Coffin, Commissars like Shea and Goldstein will determine who is a Catholic in good standing based on the latest tweet from the Anti-Defamation League. This is not a new issue in the Church. St. Paul denounced the Judaizers of his day when they tried to make Jewish taboos the norm for the Church then. Back then the Judaizers insisted that the Greek converts had to adopt circumcision and Jewish dietary laws in order to be considered Catholics in good standing. Today the neo-Judaizers, neo-Conversos, and ADL agents in the Church use the same Jewish privilege to claim that Catholics must offer up incense to the idols known as “anti-Semitism” and “Holocaust.”
The Holocaust has become the Jewish religion. Shea and Goldstein are now trying to impose that religion on the Catholic faithful. Catholics who invoke that term as normative for other Catholics are promoting idolatry. Lest you think I’m exaggerating, let me give the closing word to Claude Lanzmann, director of Shoah, a 1978 film which is one of the crucial components of the Holocaust narrative:
If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, if it goes beyond the “banality of evil,” then Christianity totters on its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanly endurable, where he endured the cruelest suffering . . . If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering which simply cannot be compared with that of Christ . . . In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from Him . . . If the pain of Auschwitz is much more extreme than that of the Apocalypse, much more horrifying than that described by John in the Apocalypse (since the Apocalypse can be described as, and even resembles, a huge, Hollywood-style spectacular, while Auschwitz is inexpressible and undescribable), then the Book of the Apocalypse is false, and the Gospels are false, too. Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ.
Keep this in mind, the next time you get an e-mail from Mark Shea or Dawn Goldstein.
Dr E. Michael Jones is the editor of www.culturewars.com and the author of more than 30 books.
For information on the Hope Is Fuel conference, organised by Catholic commentator Patrick Coffin, visit www.hopeisfuel.com.
The way the Jewish establishment target people with vicious smears and harassment is very like the methods used by Scientologists to destroy anyone that dares to criticise them.They call it 'fair game' when they do things like stand outside their cult detractor's homes with signs saying they are a pedophile. The racist smear is almost as damaging and just as hateful.